Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA)
e-journal, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
“Call for papers for the Caucasian Review of International Affairs. The Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA) is a new name of the formerly Caucasian Journal of European Affairs the first issue of which was published in [winter – ed.] 2006. After a short break due to certain technical problems the Review is being published again in a new format and with a completely new web site [at the URL below].
The CRIA is a primarily English-language quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Centre for European Studies in Azerbaijan. The CRIA focuses on various international political, economic, security and legal issues and the current developments in the South Caucasus region.
The CRIA is currently an online publication. The hard copy version of the Review is planned to be published as from the year 2008. The next issue of the CRIA will be published in December 2007.
Deadline for the submission of articles is the 15th of November 2007.
See the manuscript guidelines at: http://cria-online.org/submit.php – na.”
* Editorial Board; * Current Issue; * Back Issues; * Submit an article; * Contact us; * Recommend us; * Search.
Internet Archive (web.archive.org)
[the site was not archived at the time of this abstract]
Link reported by: Nasimi Aghayev (nasimiaghayev–at–yahoo.com),
forwarded by central-eurasia-l–at–lists.fas.harvard.edu
* Resource type [news – documents – study – corporate info. – online guide]:
* Publisher [academic – business – govt. – library/museum – NGO – other]:
* Scholarly usefulness [essential – v.useful – useful – interesting – marginal]:
* External links to the resource [over 3,000 – under 3,000 – under 1,000
– under 300 – under 100 – under 30]: 30
Src: The Asian Studies WWW Monitor ISSN 1329-9778
The e-journal [est. Apr 1994] provides free abstracts
and reviews of new/updated online resources of significance to
research, teaching and communications dealing with the Asian Studies.
The email edition of this Journal has now over 6,570 subscribers.
The AS WWW Monitor does not necessarily endorse contents,
or policies of the Internet resources it abstracts.
– regards –
Dr T. Matthew Ciolek tmciolek–at–coombs.anu.edu.au
Head, Internet Publications Bureau, RSPAS,
The National Institute for Asia and the Pacific,
The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
ph +61 (02) 61250110 fax: +61 (02) 62571893 skype: tmciolek
also, Asia Pacific Research Online at www.ciolek.com
[You may freely forward this information, but on condition that you
send the text as an integral whole along with complete information
about its author, date, and source.]
To subscribe to Asian Studies WWW Monitor email edition
send email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
message: subscribe asia-www-monitor
International students: ANU (http://studyat.anu.edu.au) CRICOS Provider Number is 00120C
VOLUME I – Winter 2006 (CRIA)
Fearful of losing its economic regional and global dominance, Iran has sought to align itself diplomatically and economically with Armenia and Russia to counter Azerbaijan’s new pro-western policies and rising economic power. This paper analyzes the international relations of the Southern Caucasus through a Neorealist paradigm to demonstrate how Iran’s behavior and action in the area were a direct result of the anarchical system that ensued after the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s. The lack of a bipolar system in the Caucasus has pushed the region to the brink of another regional conflict that could potentially be more far-reaching and widespread than that of the previously contained Nagorno-Garabagh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Iran’s foreign policy of the past decade demonstrates Iran’s pragmatism in the Southern Caucasus that is not dictated by religious ideology, but rather by Iran’s national interests, both economic and political, and national security concerns. The “New Great Game” of the post-Cold War era in the southern Caucasus will radically transform the region into one of great strategic and geopolitical importance.
Legal Aspects of the Nagorno-Garabagh Conflict By Mushfig Mammadov
The Nagorno-Garabagh conflict has been going on since 1988. The conflict between Armenia (although it denies its involvement in the conflict claiming that it is just “an interested party”) and Azerbaijan is considered to be the most important conflict in the South Caucasus. Though the object of this conflict is Nagorno-Garabagh Autonomous Region (the region was called so as an administrative-territorial area during the Soviet time), seven other districts of Azerbaijan which have nothing common with this autonomous region are also occupied by the Armed Forces of Armenia. So, as a result of the conflict approximately 20% of the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan is still under occupation and more than one million Azerbaijanis have become refugees and internally displaced persons. In May 1994 the parties concluded cease-fire agreement which is still in force today. The Republic of Azerbaijan states that Armenia should be recognized as an aggressor according to the Charter of the UN, but it is not the case yet. The Republic of Armenia claims that the Armenians of Nagorno-Garabagh are entitled to secede from Azerbaijan and build their own state on the base of the self-determination principle of international law. Now the Minsk Group of the OSCE is exercizing a mediation function between the parties to the conflict. No political agreement on the settlement of the conflict has been achieved yet.
The Galtung Triangle and Nagorno-Garabagh Conflict By Taleh Ziyadov
The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is one of the longest – standing conflicts in the former Soviet Union. Despite numerous attempts by mediating parties and direct talks between the governments of the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan, the conflict remains unresolved. In this paper, I will try to analyze the general causes of the conflict within the framework of Johan Galtung’s conflict triangle. After giving a brief description of the Galtung conflict triangle and short asymmetry and symmetry analysis, I will examine the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict using the model’s three axes – structural, cultural (social constructs) and behavioral (direct violence). The paper will investigate the nature and dynamics of the conflict in chronological order, starting from 1988 and ending with the signing of the cease-fire agreement in 1994. Hence, the purpose of this paper is limited to the three theoretical aspects of Johan Galtung’s conflict triangle and does not include the conflict’s detailed history and its post-ceasefire developments. This study aims to increase understanding of the cultural and structural causes of interethnic violence between Armenians and Azerbaijanis in 1988-1994.
Azerbaijan is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. The GDP annual surplus in 2003 was above 11%. The growth for the year 2004 is 10.2%. A record growth of circa 17% is expected in the year 2005. As per some forecasts (ADB 2005) growth in 2007 may be as much as 26%! It is highly probable that the country will be the global leader in economic growth in the coming next 2-3 years. GDP per capita is growing respectively although from a very low base. In 2004 it was USD 1042 per capita. Nominal wages grew by 26%. Almost all other major economic indicators point out a similar growth pattern.
Thieves of the Law and the Rule of Law in Georgia By Virginia Davis Nordin and Georgi Glonti
This article combines research on the Thieves of the Law in Georgia by a Georgian criminologist with the search for the real meeting of the Rule of Law in this former soviet country by an American lawyer. The first section of the paper cites some of the contradictory descriptions of the Thieves of the Law in the USSR and Georgia with a brief look at the functions of customary commercial law in emerging societies and concludes that the story of the Thieves of the Law is vital to understand the nature of Georgian society and the possibilities of establishing the Rule of Law in that Country. The next section illustrates the importance of and the continuing impact of the Thieves Law in national and international economic activities. A final conclusion stresses that defining law, crime and society is complex and that a knowledge of the particular stories of each is a necessary first step.
The Universities of Europe in the New Era By Dimitris Michalopoulos
The 1968 student crisis in France was the symptom of a rampant moral and intellectual disease; for the European universities were no longer adapted to meet the necessities of the societies that had invented them. In point of fact, the etymon of the term “university” is the mediaeval Latin word universitas, i.e. the erroneous translation of the Greek term encyclopaedia; and encyclopaedia means a general, advanced education capable of giving rise to the homo universalis. These homines universales were regarded as the natural leaders of traditional, hierarchically organized societies as were those before the French Enlightenment. Therefore, the very issue which the 1968 crisis raised was the one tackled as early as the 19th century mainly in France and Russia: Does a modern European society need universities or highly specialized schools? The time now seems ripe to opt for the second solution.
About this entry
You’re currently reading “,” an entry on GEORGIA & SOUTH CAUCASUS
- September 18, 2007 / 7:39 pm
- Armenia, Azerbaijan, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, Conflict, CRIA, Development, Economy, Geopolitic, Georgia, Iran, Karabakh, Magazin, Policy, Science, Security, South-Caucasus, Studies